MLOps, LLMOps, and Platform Engineering engagement context

Services · Platform & Operations

MLOps, LLMOps, and Platform Engineering

The infrastructure that keeps AI working after go-live

What this is

What mlops, llmops, and platform engineering covers

MLOps and LLMOps for platform teams that have models in production but no reliable way to evaluate, deploy, monitor, or roll them back. We build the CI/CD, evaluation gates, observability, and cloud architecture around your AI workloads, including the Kubernetes, Terraform, and cost controls the rest of the stack needs. Cloud architecture and DevOps engagements now run under this service.

Typical timeline: 6–12 weeks

Who hires us for this

  • Platform and SRE leads inheriting AI services with no runbooks
  • Data science teams whose notebooks became production without a deployment path
  • CTOs consolidating cloud spend across AI and non-AI workloads

Problems we get hired for

What usually goes wrong before we are called

A prompt change broke production and nobody noticed for a week

Eval gates in CI block deploys that regress on the golden set. Drift dashboards alert on agreement rate and latency, not only on uptime.

GPU bills nobody can explain

Per-team cost attribution, autoscaling with scale-to-zero for bursty inference, and right-sizing reviews. Terraform makes the environment reproducible.

Rollback means redeploying from someone's laptop

Versioned prompts, models, and configs with one-command rollback. Blue-green or canary deploys for model swaps.

How the engagement runs

Steps and the artifact each one produces

  1. 01

    Assessment

    Inventory of models, pipelines, environments, and gaps against a production checklist.

    Artifact: Gap report and prioritised backlog

  2. 02

    Foundations

    Infrastructure as code, CI/CD, secrets, and observability baseline.

    Artifact: Terraform modules and pipelines

  3. 03

    AI-specific gates

    Eval suites in CI, prompt and model registries, drift monitoring, and rollback paths.

    Artifact: Eval gates and dashboards

  4. 04

    Handover

    On-call runbooks, cost reports, and a quarterly platform review.

    Artifact: Runbooks and cost dashboard

Stack

Tools we reach for

Chosen per engagement against your existing platform. Nothing here is mandatory; everything here has shipped.

InfrastructureKubernetes · Terraform · AWS, Azure, GCP · NVIDIA GPU Operator
CI/CDGitHub Actions · ArgoCD · Promptfoo eval gates
RegistriesMLflow · Hugging Face Hub (private) · Versioned prompt store
ObservabilityOpenTelemetry · Langfuse · Prometheus and Grafana · PagerDuty
OrchestrationTemporal · Airflow · Kafka

What you receive

Deliverables

  • Gap report against a production checklist
  • Infrastructure as code and CI/CD pipelines
  • Eval gates, registries, and rollback paths
  • Drift and cost dashboards
  • On-call runbooks

Engagement models

How we can be hired for this

ModelShapeTypical duration
Fixed-scope pilotDefined workflow, defined integration points, defined exit metric. Priced as a project.4–12 weeks
Production retainerMonthly capacity for evals, monitoring, model refreshes, and new workflows. Month-to-month.3+ months
Embedded podOne architect plus two to four senior engineers working inside your repos and rituals.3–9 months

Pricing and phase gates are described on How we work.

Questions buyers ask

Frequently asked questions

Do you also handle non-AI cloud architecture?
Yes. The same Terraform, Kubernetes, and CI/CD foundations serve the rest of the platform. Former cloud architecture and DevOps engagements are delivered under this service.
What is an eval gate?
A CI step that runs the golden question or case set against the new prompt or model and fails the build if quality drops below a threshold. It is the AI equivalent of a failing unit test.
Can you work inside our existing cloud accounts and tooling?
That is the default. We add modules and pipelines to your repos and use your identity provider and secrets manager. Nothing runs in a Xenqube account.
How do you measure drift for LLM features?
Agreement rate against operator decisions, eval-set score on a schedule, latency and cost per request, and override reasons. Alerts fire on trend, not on a single bad day.

When this is the wrong fit

  • Teams with one prototype and no production traffic; start with the agent or LLM service instead.
  • Organisations looking to outsource all operations permanently; we hand over to your on-call.

Next step

Send the workflow. We reply with an architecture sketch.

Describe the queue, the system of record, and who signs off today. First brief is free; NDA first if you prefer.

Request an Architecture Brief